Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 18 results ...
Agyekum, K, Hammond, S F and Salgin, B (2021) Occupants' perceived importance and satisfaction with the indoor environmental quality of a green building. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 627-42.
Amarachukwu Nnadozie, N and Wilkinson, S (2021) Building code amendment and building resilience: perspective of building code users in New Zealand. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 643-59.
Ayda Montaser, K and Heidari, S (2021) Optimizing window size by integrating energy and lighting analyses considering occupants' visual satisfaction. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 673-86.
Dewagoda, K G, Perera, B and Senaratne, S (2021) A "knowledge value chain" framework for contractor organisations to maximise chances of winning tenders. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 577-93.
Ekanayake, E, Shen, G Q and Kumaraswamy, M (2021) Supply chain resilience: mapping the knowledge domains through a bibliometric approach. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 705-21.
Ghomi, S G, Wedawatta, G, Ginige, K and Ingirige, B (2021) Living-transforming disaster relief shelter: a conceptual approach for sustainable post-disaster housing. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 687-704.
Khatibi, H, Wilkinson, S, Baghersad, M, Heiman, D, Ramli, H, Suhatril, M, Javanmardi, A and Ghaedi, K (2021) The resilient-smart city development: a literature review and novel frameworks exploration. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 493-510.
Kumarasiri, B and Dissanayake, P (2021) Barriers to implementing waste-to-energy projects in Sri Lanka: a PESTEL analysis. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 544-58.
Mayara Regina, M and Tavares, S F (2021) Materials passport's review: challenges and opportunities toward a circular economy building sector. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 767-82.
Nandun Madhusanka Hewa, W, Pan, W and Kumaraswamy, M (2021) Social network analysis applications in sustainable construction and built environment management: a review. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 511-28.
Olajide, J F, Ajayi, O O, Kudirat Ibilola, Z and Adenuga, O A (2021) Climatic conditions and the resilience of buildings along Lagos coastline. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 738-49.
Perera, G, Tennakoon, T, Kulatunga, U, Jayasena, H S and Wijewickrama, M (2021) Selecting suitable procurement system for steel building construction. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 611-26.
Perera, S, Senaratne, S, Rodrigo, M N N and Brady, L (2021) Analysis of embodied carbon and cost profiles of school buildings in Australia. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 660-72.
Ranadewa, K, Sandanayake, Y G and Siriwardena, M (2021) Enabling lean through human capacity building: an investigation of small and medium contractors. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 594-610.
Ratnasabapathy, S, Alashwal, A and Perera, S (2021) Exploring the barriers for implementing waste trading practices in the construction industry in Australia. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 559-76.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: circular economy; construction and demolition waste; waste management; resource recovery; construction materials; recycling; sustainability; impact analysis; supply chains; mathematical models
- ISBN/ISSN:
- URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-04-2020-0077
- Abstract:
The construction industry is a major generator of waste, which has a high potential to yield a substantial amount of waste into the economy as a valuable resource. Waste trading (WT) is a sustainable strategy for improving resource utilisation and transitioning the construction industry towards the circular economy. However, resource recovery through WT is greatly impeded by several barriers which have not been highlighted in previous research. This paper aims to determine the barriers for implementing effective WT practices in the Australian construction and demolition (C&D) sector. To achieve the aim of this research, a triangulation approach of quantitative and qualitative methods has been used. This mixed-method approach combines a comprehensive literature review, a questionnaire survey using an expert forum and semi-structured interviews with industry experts. This study has explored a wide range of barriers to the practices of WT in the C&D sector, which have been categorised based on six perspectives. From a collective perspective, the technical barriers were found to be most important among other categories. The key individual barriers found in this study include the following: the high cost associated with sorting and processing of waste on-site, lack of consistent waste data and reporting system at project, industry and national level, insufficient secured and established market for reusable/recycled waste materials, lack of communication and coordination among stakeholders, lack of user-friendly and active web-based waste exchange systems (with reliable waste information) and lack of incentives from the government to encourage market development. Overcoming these barriers collectively would enable the wide application of WT, which in turn, would have a positive impact on the economy, environment and efficiency of the industry. The outcomes of this study are based on the data collected only in the state of New South Wales (NSW) in Australia which is considered as the limitation of this study. This study contributes to the body of knowledge of C&D waste management (WM) by providing the theoretical and practical implications of closing the loop material cycle by highlighting the importance of economic and environmental benefits of WT. In this study, WT has been recognised as a sustainable strategy to manage waste by identifying the barriers impeding the wider application of effective trading practices in the C&D sector. The findings are useful to WM businesses engaged to establish new circular business models and to government/regulatory bodies in developing initiatives and incentives aiming to promote WT strategies and market platforms. Further research is suggested to test and validate the findings from other jurisdictions of Australia.
Sirimewan, D C, Mendis, A, Damitha, R, Samaraweera, A and Naiduwa Handi Chathuri, M (2021) Analysis of issues in sustainable water management of irrigation systems: case of a developing country. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 529-43.
Tariq, H, Pathirage, C and Fernando, T (2021) Measuring community disaster resilience using Q-methods: a physical resilience perspective. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 722-37.
Wijewansha, A S, Tennakoon, G A, Waidyasekara, K and Ekanayake, B J (2021) Implementation of circular economy principles during pre-construction stage: the case of Sri Lanka. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 11(4), 750-66.